Seaguy: Slaves of Mickey Eye # 2
Written by Grant Morrison
Art by Cameron Stewart & Dave Stewart
Published by Vertigo/DC Comics
Usually, if you're going to make the argument that somebody should spend less of their time writing about Batman punching things and more of their time writing lines like "You weren't eight months pregnant when you left this morning", you're probably somebody who isn't inordinately that pleasurable to be around, in the "let's all eat out of the same trough" way in which that's determined. That is, unless you're talking about Grant Morrison, who--as long as you avoid reading his whiny interviews where he displays a fundamental disconnect between the reality of how much freedom he actually has on super-hero corporate property comics and his interpretation of that reality--is able to shift gears at a remarkable rate almost unparalled in current Big Two clock-punchers. And while it should go without saying that the pleasures of Seaguy: Slaves of Mickey Eye are in many ways tied up in the artwork by the reprehensibly underused Cameron Stewart, it won't go unsaid here: Cameron Stewart is an "offer him your daughters to help propagate his seed" talent. The guy puts so many of his peers to shame that it's a wonder Seaguy doesn't come with a Surgeon General's Warning saying "All ya'll hacks best stay away, less'en you want to cry."
The AvengersWritten by Brian Michael Bendis
Art by Jim Cheung & Mark Morales
Published by Marvel Comics
This is one of those free comics that comics shops gave away on Free Comic Book Day--according to people who might know while still having no reason for caring, it was the second most popular one of the bunch. The Factual Opinion's comic-book-pick-up team didn't know any better than to take a pass when it was offered in a shady "under-the-counter" deal (the actual line was "Hey. Did you get Avengers and Blackest Night? It's no problem, you're good people, I got some right here. Tell No One."), so that's why it's here. Now, if you only read one Bendis Avengers comic this year, that's probably because you only read this one, because it was free, and because you were bored. In some countries, they use comics like these to convince men to mutilate their own genitals, thus saving torturer-types from nightmares. In America, this is considered special enough to treat like crack cocaine or decent meth. Go figure.
Battle For The Cowl: The Network # 1Written by Fabian Nicieza
Art by Don Kramer, J. Calafiore, Mark McKenna & JD Smith
Published by DC Comics
The Network provides an opportunity to look at what corporate types call "re-branding", where you take a dormant or failing product--in this case, Birds of Prey, which used to be a mediocre piece of shit about and for boring people, became a tolerable piece of cheese cake-shit with the addition of writer Gail Simone, and then spiraled back down to mediocre before getting out the shovel and digging its way towards "fucking joke" after she bailed out for Six-ier pastures, eventually getting cancelled in one of the sort of mercy kills that's most often seen on the racetrack when a pony breaks a femur--and attempt to make it salable again. Fabian Nicieza follows the one re-branding rule that's required: give it a new name--but beyond that, The Network is just another brick in the wall of trying to make the Birds Of Prey work without the only thing that ever made it work, which began and ended with the name "Gail Simone". While it's certainly a Jack Chick style Good News moment that writers are important enough that their absence portends lack of quality, it's still pathetic when talented dudes--like Nicieza--can't make a whole bunch of semi-popular female characters read as anything less then a poorly-though out retread of something that used to, kind of, matter.
To a few people.
Mostly perverts.
The Boys # 30Written by Garth Ennis
Art by Darick Robertson & Tony Avina
Published by Dynamite Entertainment
There's really no good in-story necessity for Garth Ennis to open up the latest issue of The Boys by playing out a four page joke where he deals some Tiny Titans/Power Pack character-types the same fate wrought out in issue 29 for the entirety of Marvel's X-Men related characters. It's just there because it's The Boys, the only comic book currently available that can showcase the merciless slaughter of a bunch of prepubescent cutie-pie Trying-So-Harders. It's not fan-service, because the audience that reads Tiny Titans/Power Pack/whatever else those things are doesn't have a huge component of readers ironically keeping up with those books in hopes that something really fucking mean will happen to children. The people who read those comics, like--they really want to read those comics. There's no other reason to pay attention to them. Alternatively, Gallup polls have shown that at least 70% of regular X-book readers "Strongly Disagree" with everything that happens in those comics, which is why The Boys #29 was so neccessary: it satisfied a need. Issue 30? It just handles a "want."
Destroyer # 2Written by Robert Kirkman
Art by Cory Walker & Val Staples
Published by Marvel MAX
If the first issue of this was a startling slice of "huh, some Marvel MAX comic not by Azzarello or Ennis doesn't make my cunt cry" mixed with a little "wait, some revamp comic about old characters isn't solely for people who remember old characters", then the second issue is where things get more of the same while incrementally skipping around a plot that, what the fuck I know, doesn't suck at all. While there's moments here to give credit to Kirkman for--the line "I ripped his tongue out before I realized he was about as smart as a dolphin. Felt like beating a dog" is pretty goddamn priceless--the praise this time is all wrapped up in Cory Walker's stellar depictions of Pissed Off, Fucked Up, and Mean. While any enjoyment is going to be tangled up with how much tolerance one has left for "let's bring back old spandex characters and fuck 'em up", there's a purity to Destroyer that's hard not to like. It's comic book violence that ignores Tony Soprano and Jack Bauer clones completely, and it doesn't miss around with half-ass imitations of Aaron Sorkin dialog. It's an elderly Popeye Doyle without the racism, kicking ass like he's in a John Carpenter movie. Fuck that explicit content label: this is a comic that kids should have been given for free in place of that Blackest Night thing. They might actually wanted to have come back and pay for one later.
Final Crisis Aftermath Run! # 1Written by Matthew Sturges
Art by Freddie Williams II
Published by DC Comics
Hey, if you're going to publish a bunch of follow-up mini-series to a huge DC cross-over event mini-series, specifically the one that had a relatively unique version of the never-fucking-stops controversial response that roughly broke down into "I don't get this fucking shit" on one side and "You're the fucking shit for not getting it" on the other, why not focus on the characters that is about as well-known as a third-rate Aquaman villain? It's certainly going to stir up the comic book newstands to throw out a comic, ironically called "Run!" that focuses on an overweight, overhairy villainous clone of Mario--Is that Wario?--and say "Yes, this is going to be six issues long, because we know you'll buy just about anything, because there's really only two of you doing that whole I-make-my-own-continuity-with-my-impeccable-taste thing." Let's boil it down to brass tacks, and while we're boiling water, let's stick our face in it and wait until we look like Deadpool: this is a six issue mini-series about the time when Wario decided to be serious because his daughter has Werner's syndrome. (I think. There's something fucked up about that little girl's face.) It's on sale now, and while it doesn't totally forgive Grant Morrison's "nobody uses my ideas and that makes me feel like listening to the Dave Matthews Band" attitude, it does, after a fashion, explain it.
-Tucker Stone, 2009
"talented dudes--like Nicieza--"
Wait... WHAT?!?!
That's the single least Tucker Stone-ish thing I've ever heard anyone say.
Posted by: MarkAndrew | 2009.05.10 at 20:59
Well, you had to expect me to eventually open up and admit to liking the first four issues of Turok: the Native American Dino-Killer.
Posted by: Tucker Stone | 2009.05.10 at 21:30
Nicieza is one of comics' best kept secrets. I mean, look at the guy: he only gets the shittiest of the shit jobs. Like, if they're going to cancel something in six months, or if they book has already had three writers in an eight-month period, or if its a needless one-off spin-off of a poorly received event comic, or if the bigger-name writer is busy and needs an assist on "scripting" duties - well, Nicieza is right there in the thick of it.
And the thing is, for all the horrendous comics he has been attached to in his career, he is almost good enough at what he does to make you think that sometimes, just sometimes, a solid attention to craft and good ear for character is enough to overcome even the worst editorially-mandated swill context in the universe. If anyone at any of these companies had half a brain they'd actually give him a project that wasn't already a zombie and he'd probably blow it up like the World Trade, in the immortal words of Soulja Slim.
And yes, I've still got the first three years of New Warriors squirreled away, why do you ask?
Posted by: Tim O'Neil | 2009.05.11 at 00:00
I think your review of "The Network #1" should win an award for the best use of a run-on sentence.
But then again, I'm a fan of Nicieza X-Men comics from the 90s, so my tastes are suspect.
Posted by: Richard | 2009.05.11 at 04:47
I wish Bendis would stop pissing away his talent on trying to force Avengers to read like a play. I also wish he would go back to working on more books like Powers. I mean, I understand collecting a paycheck, but it's just so uninspired.
Kirkman is everything right with comics. If companies like Marvel were actually trying to increase their sales base, they'd stop pretending like Avengers is going to appeal to everyone and they'd make books like Kirkman's stuff their FCBD/ public face. Kids are never coming back to you, Marvel.
Niciezia is criminally underrated because he only wants to play in the Big Two's sandbox. My guess is he's still eating shit sandwhiches from something he did while EIC at Valiant.
Sorry this is all super grouchy, I'm still very, very tired....
Posted by: Kenny | 2009.05.11 at 08:48
Destroyer isn't bad, but it seems like more of Kirkman recycling stuff from his earlier books, in this case Brit (which itself recycled some Battle Pope). Still, it's nice to see someone write an old, tired character rather than the perenially young and chipper types we usually see.
Posted by: Matthew J. Brady | 2009.05.11 at 09:56
That's disappointing about Destroyer, I didn't realize it was retreading. Still, I'm more interested in it because of the art, it's got a real nice rhythm to it. That lead-up to the helicopter dive, or the part where the guy rips off the robot lady skull--it's really striking, well designed stuff. I like it.
Nicieza--i don't know how underrated he is, although I think I'd chalk most of that up to what Tim was mentioning. I don't know that I've read anything by him (except that Turok comic) where he wasn't handling a mercenary tie-in book (Battle for the Cowl, X-O Manowar Versus Iron Man) or a book headed for cancellation (like Robin). It's like watching a guy jump rope while a bunch of little kids hold his feet to the ground. The fact that he's able to produce anything readable is a feat in and of itself, and sometimes, yeah, the shit isn't that bad. If he had more freedom, I don't know, maybe it would be better. But the guy has been handling crap titles for a loooong fucking time. Everybody has a breaking point.
Posted by: Tucker Stone | 2009.05.11 at 10:06
Tucker, Nicezia has been putting work in on a comic called The 99. It's an off the beaten path type of comic because it's stated goal is to promote Muslims as being normal people by showing what superheros would do in an Islamic context. It's not Watchmen or anything, but it is a lot of fun and it's a nice social message. Anyway, Nicezia has been doing good work there and has been showing he can make good comics but he seems determined to cash a paycheck from the Big Two. Also, Nicezia was the first guy to pair up Warren Ellis with Darrick Robertson, so he gets a pass from me on that.
As for Destroyer, I haven't read any of it yet, but Kirkman is a name I trust. Walking Dead and Invincible are both great reads. They're interesting because they're really good in the soap opera molds plus Kirkman is like the one guy to really "get" Watchmen and use a lot of the narrative structuring Moore introduced. Reading his work is bizarre, because it feels so much like a guilty read, but there's actually meat there if you like to dig into structure.
As for Destroyer, I can say yes, Kirkman goes to the well a *lot* with the old, tired superman. On the other hand, I can't blame him with submitting an old, tired idea to Marvel. Kirkman definitely understands the importance of owning his own IPs and as the new face of Image, would be a fool to give away new ideas to Marvel. Cashing a paycheck off of old, recycled ideas? That's living the American Dream right there!
Posted by: Kenny | 2009.05.11 at 10:35
Hm, from what Stuart Moore said about the 99, I think a bit more of the credit for the series should be on the shoulders of Naif Al-Mutawa. From the little i've seen, Nicezia does good work on it, but a big part of what's impressive about that series is the groundwork and research setting up the characters and Islamic theme, and I don't really believe that's something Nicezia can lay claim to.
Posted by: Tucker Stone | 2009.05.11 at 10:57
I'm sorry if I was overstating Nicezia's role in The 99. I was just trying to say Nicezia is doing good work there and he's showing he can take novel concepts and do good work with them as opposed to his normal role of sheparding books to the grave.
BTW - I feel like I should mention I have a vested interest in the 99. A good friend of my fiance just did a documentary on the book and I'm all for any work that portrays Muslims as normal people!
Have you read any of the 99, btw? It's surprisingly good. I say that because I feel like most books that are trying to promote a religious angle - any religious angle - are usually crap. The 99 doesn't fall into the normal trap of trying to be Davey & Goliath, it's just trying to highlight Islamic values and stress those values aren't at odds with being a member of society. It's a refreshing change of pace. I can't comment on the quality of the stories because I'm biased to the message, so I'd be interested in seeing what you have to say.
Posted by: Kenny | 2009.05.11 at 11:23
I don't think you're overstating it too much, Nicezia is the day-to-day guy for 99, and I don't think that can be completely dismissed out of hand. But it seems to me that the 99 is just another Battle For The Cowl type job, if you're look at his role as a "hired gun". It might be a better, from what I've heard, it is, but it's not like it's a book where he's free to do whatever he wants.
I have only seen a little of the 99 online, but when I interviewed Stuart Moore at NYCC, he talked about the project's origin and went into detail about its ambitions, and yeah, it certainly seems impressive. Initially, it sounded a lot like propaganda--positive propaganda, but propaganda nonetheless--but after reading a bit more about it, it seems more that it's a project doing the best it can within the strict environments where it is being sold. The stuff Moore was saying about how you have to depict young women in a comic so that it doesn't raise red flags was particularly interesting. Still, I haven't actually read a large enough range of the comic to have much of an opinion on it. It's got good motives, sure. But I'm really only interested in it because of the story behind its inception.
Posted by: Tucker Stone | 2009.05.11 at 14:22
Tucker, would you like me to buy you some digital copies? I'd really like to see you or Matt Brady give a review of it because both of you would recognize the propaganda for what it is and still evaluate it within the context of is it a good read despite the propaganda.
For me, I'm too vested in the propaganda- I want that message out there - so my opinion is close to worthless on it.
I mean, you're right, it's still hired gun stuff for Nicezia, it's just better than his usual because it's a concept with a future as opposed to his normal going down with the ship jobs.
Could Nicezia ever write his own concept? He tried with that battle fairy book at Valiant that was god awful, but it was one attempt on a very weak concept. I'd be interested to see what he could do beside that....
Posted by: Kenny | 2009.05.11 at 15:21
The more I read about Final Crisis Aftermath: Run! #1 the more I want it.
Posted by: Jim Kingman | 2009.05.11 at 15:47
All of this discussion really just makes me miss Cable and Deadpool. It's like, Geoff Johns isn't a shitty writer because he only writes superhero stuff, he's a shitty writer because he's a humorless tone deaf manchild writing for mental deficients. So yeah, Nicieza has been attached to crap more often than not, but stuff like Cable and Deadpool justifies or at least excuses his seeming fixation with working within the big two.
I'm not sure any of that made sense, but seriously: Cable and Deadpool.
Posted by: AERose | 2009.05.11 at 19:58
I knew it, I knew IT, I've been reading Geoff Johns comics since, oh, 1999, I suppose, and I could never quite peg what kind of person that made me. Imagine, almost a decade in the bag, well into my forties, already stricken by an arrested development that I've been carrying with me and nurturing since the age of ten; oh, but how to define it!! Finally, it has been made clear: I am a Mental Deficient! Thank the lord I can type!!!
Posted by: Jim Kingman | 2009.05.12 at 10:33
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT
Posted by: Tucker Stone | 2009.05.12 at 22:23
Nicieza, Christ, I remember when this guy came on the scene...I absolutely hated him, everything he touched was like reading Tom DeFalco MTIOs (ha, MarkAndrew), and he came across as the most horrible fanboy ever. But here's a thing you can't say about a whole lot of your superhero comics writers these days: he worked hard to learn his craft, and I can't think of a single good reason not to read something written by him now. I applaud the guy, he's probably the last old-school solid journeyman Marvel Comics writer there's ever going to be. Somebody should give him Geoff Johns' job, I bet he'd kill at it. I'd shake his fucking hand.
Attention must be paid!
Posted by: plok | 2009.05.13 at 01:11
I don't know how anyone can say Geoff Johns is humorless after he wrote that Sinestro Corps: Superman-Prime one-shot, where the entire conceit of the comic is literally "a super-powered Newsarama poster beats up half the DC Universe."
Posted by: Dave | 2009.05.13 at 11:17
Kingman: well of course he's not writing for you. He's writing for, you know, those people.
(Seriously I had the opportunity to bash Geoff Johns and talk up Cable and Deadpool and I took it. I apologize for nothing!)
Posted by: AERose | 2009.05.13 at 15:41
That comment would have worked better with italics.
Posted by: AERose | 2009.05.13 at 15:42
anyone remember NFL Superpro? Nicieza wrote it because he was promised tickets to te super bowl
Posted by: Nathan | 2009.05.14 at 13:23
I've never been called a "those people" before, cool
Posted by: nathan | 2009.05.15 at 12:00