« The Top 25 Albums of 1983: #9 | Main | The Top 25 Albums of 1983: #8 »

2007.10.08

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I think you just sold an issue of Deathblow...

Thanks.

Re:Legion 34

uh...what?

Sean: Forgot to mention-the deathblow pic? That's the "Osamasaurus." As in...yeah, you got it.

The weakest issue of the series yet, and the only one that has art problems. Jock's work has never seemed this unfinished--even the cover is the worst in the mans career thus far.

Again, what? You're out of your gourd, my friend.

Markus: You're welcome?

E.Catto: Don't know what to tell you--Legion #34 is a garbage fiesta, and Jock phoned it in on Green Arrow. We're standing on principle on that--it's non-negotiable.

Schizos also rarely know when they're crazy. Much luck.

Most of these are good comics. Ur a dumb ass.

Not much you can say to that, is there? Some of these are good comics. Most of them aren't. You're welcome to disagree--but you're just wrong, and whether that wrongness stems from having incredibly low expectations, not being very smart, or just assuming that since you read it, you've got to believe it's good to assuage the expenditure of time and money--it doesn't matter. They aren't that good.

So no, young tenderfoot. You, and only you, are the "dumb ass."

Try again.

"but you're just wrong, and whether that wrongness stems from having incredibly low expectations, not being very smart, or just assuming that since you read it, you've got to believe it's good to assuage the expenditure of time and money--it doesn't matter. They aren't that good."

Boy ur making a lot of assumptions there, but childish insults aside, you miss the one possible explenation that seems the most obvious: you don't have taste.

I may not have the taste it requires to debate whether or not Bedard's Legion is any good--which it isn't--or whether or not Jock's work in #5 is near the quality of the first four issues--which it wasn't...but at least I can spell "explanation."

But as always E--thanks for playing. New comic reviews where you can marvel at the Factual's lack of taste will be up Monday.

"but at least I can spell "explanation.""

OOOh, a speller on the internet, you're really down to the dregs. It's clear, you have not a bone of a leg to stand on. Nah, I won.t be back. There is neither taste nor basic logic to be found. Have a good one, I have a feeling this will be the largest number of posts you've ever had.

This is turning into a real message board! I couldn't be more pleased.

Deathblow's outfit had nothing to do with the Ku Klux Klan, it was an Abu Ghraib reference.

You're my new favourite reviewer. Nothing as enjoyable as a well done piss taking. But, when your "critics" don't value their words enough to spell or punctuate correctly, why even respond?

Brad-Up until this little battle started, the personal rule was that if somebody was kind enough to comment, I'd guarantee a personal response, Dear Abby style.

It was during this little skirmish that I realized that that was not something that was going to be as entertaining as I had previously anticipated.

Woo, some snippy comments here, huh? Just wanted to say that I enjoy your reviews - you're pretty funny. :)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe
My Photo