« Comics Of The Weak: No One Gets Away Clean With Their Pants Around Their Ankles | Main | Somebody Asked For This, Vol. 1: Via Email, Via Snarky Request Or From The Hands Of The Creator »

2008.04.14

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Dear Virgin Read,

I have no strong feelings either way about Judd Winnick, just a question about the reading experience. Do you feel that the style of the art contributed to your sense that the comic was charming? Personally, when I see a Cliff Chiang-drawn character, I want to hug them!

Despite what the cover says, this issue was actually drawn by Mike Norton and Wayne Faucher, as listed in the interior credits.

Just, you know, if you wanna be factual.

That was my mistake, not Ms. Miller's. It's corrected, apologies to Norton & Fauchner.

Judd Winnick can be a really great writer.

But sometimes he just has awful ideas like killing characters that people like with reckless abandon.

Or bringing ones back to life that have been dead for 20 years that no one else dared to touch.

"Despite what the cover says, this issue was actually drawn by Mike Norton and Wayne Faucher, as listed in the interior credits."

Oh, and it's still worth reading? Where is Chiang? I shall have to take a look before plunking down my money.

"I hear that some people don’t like Judd Winick…? I mean, c’mon, would you rather read Puck's version of comics?"

Um...Hell yes? I think Puck's writing would be *way* more entertaining than Winick's!

DK-
Chiang is gone. He's going to handle covers for a while, but no more will he be handling interiors.

I love the idea of a column written by a neophyte... someone too new to have her reviews marred by the standard prejudices.

Case in point: admitting that maybe Judd Winick ISN'T the death of all that is good and beautiful in the world.

What inbred tossers run this site?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe
My Photo